Use PAL-safe colors...
Moderators: Víctor Paredes, Belgarath, slowtiger
Use PAL-safe colors...
...Well, nothing to add, only that I'd like (very much) can see this export function in future versions, of course... Only that, GOOD BYE "Pals"!
- Squeakydave
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 9:44 pm
- Location: UK - London-ish
- Contact:
- Lost Marble
- Site Admin
- Posts: 2355
- Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2004 6:02 pm
- Location: Scotts Valley, California, USA
- Contact:
It's harder to find information about PAL safe colors than NTSC safe colors. However, from what I have found, PAL seems to be about the same as NTSC in this regard. I would try just using the NTSC color safe option and see how that works. Remember, even for NTSC this is just an approximation - you should still do some testing on a TV if you're working on a broadcast project.
Certainly not the same
Hi sir...
Just wanted to make a or the statement, that the difference between NTSC and PAL is very big.
I used to work for a company, who also converted from 'alot of formats' to 'alot of formats', I remember the 'huge' difference, seeing NTSC-signal without the conversion...
So, it is a real ballgame to explore for PAL colours.
But for now, rendering uncompressed and use 'your' european video-editor, render and output PAL.
MAGIX is a real cheap one, and a real editor doesn't use zillion effects, so the cheapest version is 'done processing' overhere.
Just wanted to make a or the statement, that the difference between NTSC and PAL is very big.
I used to work for a company, who also converted from 'alot of formats' to 'alot of formats', I remember the 'huge' difference, seeing NTSC-signal without the conversion...
So, it is a real ballgame to explore for PAL colours.
But for now, rendering uncompressed and use 'your' european video-editor, render and output PAL.
MAGIX is a real cheap one, and a real editor doesn't use zillion effects, so the cheapest version is 'done processing' overhere.
Get rid of the path's, just life.