Hack

[1999]

You all got a Big problem...........

[Rasheed]

Please, clarify yourself.

[1999]

Go to the first topic........

[synthsin75]

And? What's wrong with trying to safeguard the forum?

[mkelley]

And it's not a hack, it's spam. All forums get it, and all forums have to deal with it (usually the admins delete the message and lock the user).

Short of not allowing new members there is absolutely no way ANY forum can be free from this. Anyone who knows anything about forums would understand that it's just something one has to put up with.

[1999]

You can't put it on the server,and use a control word for it?............like new user etc,etc,etc?

[mkelley]

As usual, I understand almost nothing of what you write (but I'm not saying this is completely my fault -- I'm guessing English isn't your first language. And I have great admiration for anyone who can write in another language, as I certainly can't).

You can put blocks on words used in messages and/or topic headings, but you just can't stop new users from joining and posting whatever they want (after the fact you can block their email address, of course, but new email addresses are easy to come by).

[synthsin75]

Do you ever post in complete sentences, or even complete thoughts? I get the feeling we're only catching like half of some internal dialog.

[1999]

Dam,you hit right in the b*lls,don't you.......i been here before this happen! .......... p.m please to keep ths out of the forum.......please to understand your comment...?????

[synthsin75]

Okay, I'll give you a break, but you do seem to be looking to cause trouble. Anyway, that's all this fire I plan on fanning.

[1999]

I just said their was a fire in the house,or somebody got the best of some one, the one other has said that is spam i said why not a hack which sometimes don't work..........if it was that simple then we all would be though about now,it's fact.

[heyvern]

Please, clarify yourself.

Oh my goodness! I fell off my chair laughing at the absurdity of that question directed to our most eloquent member, 1999.

He, of all the members here, has a true grasp of modern textual communication. I never have trouble understanding him*.



p.s. There was some naughty pictures posted earlier that this is in reference to I assume? Just a guess? I got rid of it as soon as I saw but since I took a nap this evening it was probably up there for a few hours.

-vern


* because I make up stuff in my head and replace it with what he actually wrote.

[synthsin75]

That's priceless Vern. 'Modern textual communication', uh? I must be a backward primitive then. What's that saying about monkeys on typewriters? As good as Shakespeare, I hear.

[Rasheed]

At least, he's not a stalker like animations4you.

BTW Wasn't 1999 the title of a British SF series, where the moon got out of Earth's orbit after an atomic explosion? It was a lot of bad acting and equally bad SFX. Still, if you replaced what you saw on screen with what you saw in your mind's eye, it was watchable. I'm glad I have a lot of imagination, so I can sit through most television nowadays. My mind just wanders off to Never-Never-Land. Or I get a sketchpad and start doodling. That passes the time until I have to go to bed.

[jahnocli]

BTW Wasn't 1999 the title of a British SF series, where the moon got out of Earth's orbit after an atomic explosion? It was a lot of bad acting and equally bad SFX.

Yep. It was based on the Fireball XL5/Joe 90 etc.. puppet series -- but I think the puppets in the earlier series were better actors.