Better quality rendering.

[MarkBorok]

Right now my workaround for this problem would be to export the detailed parts as .png files and re-import them as image layers. Still a bit dodgy, but better than the alternative.

I do agree that rendering improvements should be at the top of the list for the next version. Any other nifty features can wait. In addition to the aforementioned loss of detail, I've found some artifacts in my renders. One character has white eyes within black lashes, and I get gray smudges where the black and white areas meet.

[cribble]

(the 80's family movie, 12-year-old bullies side-kick, friend)

"YEAH"

[melkman]

High,
forgive me my bad rusty english.
At first big thanks for the nice Moho program, the bone binding is great.
I had taken all the tutorials i can get and i read the Forum up and down, but the Render - Quality (Jpg - Png ) stays.
The first thing what stands on Top on my wishlist is the thick line Thingi (Preview Window looks better then Render).
Your Program is very easy too use and to learn,
only the Render thing got me stucked ..

Greetz melk

[Rai López]

...oOUUuhhh yes! The poor quality render issue in lines (and shapes too) is one of the most important problems that Moho presents when you treat to get decent final results with the program... I always have said that is ironic be working with vector graphics, with which you can get infinity quality in your vector large scales but when you try to decrease it the quality fall off in this way... Yes! I HOPE more precission in the level of detail it be possible in the near future of Moho or the program will never be in the place that it (he) deserve... and would de a PITY!

[Squeakydave]

My current work around is to export to Flash. The quality of the output is so superior if you have a project that is suitable.

[Lost Marble]

Great news about rendering quality. See the following thread:

http://www.lostmarble.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2645