Page 1 of 2

Euro English

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 9:39 am
by Nolan Scott
Just fall over this little article about the introduction of "Euro-English".
Maybe even non europeans find this hilarious.


Euro-English"

The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby
English will be the official language of the European Union rather
than German, which was the other possibility.

As part of the negotiations, the British Government conceded that
English spelling had some room for improvement and has accepted a 5-
year phase-in plan that would become known as "Euro-English".

In the first year, "s" will replace the soft "c". Sertainly, this
will make the sivil servants jump with joy.

The hard "c" will be dropped in favour of "k". This should klear up
konfusion, and keyboards kan have one less letter There will be
growing publik enthusiasm in the sekond year when the troublesome
"ph" will be replaced with "f". This will make words like fotograf
20% shorter.

In the 3rd year, publik akseptanse of the new spelling kan be
expekted to reach the stage where more komplikated changes are
possible.

Governments will enkourage the removal of double letters which have
always ben a deterent to akurate speling.

Also, al wil agre that the horibl mes of the silent "e" in the
languag is disgrasful and it should go away.

By the 4th yer people wil be reseptiv to steps such as replasing "th"
with "z" and "w" with "v".

During ze fifz yer, ze unesesary "o" kan be dropd from vords
kontaining "ou" and after ziz fifz yer, ve vil hav a reil sensibl
riten styl.

Zer vil be no mor trubl or difikultis and evrivun vil find it ezi tu
understand ech oza. Ze drem of a united urop vil finali kum tru.

Und efter ze fifz yer, ve vil al be speking German like zey vunted in
ze forst plas.


Cheers
Nolan

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:54 pm
by cribble
hahaha thats well good...hey?!

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 2:55 pm
by 2ner
Well I'm non-European and I do find it hilarious.
Is there any truth to this?

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 3:17 pm
by rylleman
2ner wrote:Is there any truth to this?
None whatsover...
But the EU has 12 official languages (I think it's 12) in which every official document has to be translated to, costing enormous sums each year, so they should definitely need to cut down to one official language. Problem is, everyone wants their language as the official and wouldn't accept some other countrys.
I'd suggest using Interlingua, a nice constructed language based on latin.

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:05 pm
by Karpi
Hilarioz!

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:42 pm
by Rai López
:idea: ...I'd suggest using Mars Attacks! martians dialect :roll: (It'd sound funny :) , I think...)

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 4:55 pm
by jorgy
Karpi wrote:Hilarioz!
HAHAHAHAHA!

Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2005 11:07 pm
by mr. blaaa
Verflucht! Ich wusste es! Ich wuuussteee eeees!!

Hm... I think it is not a mistake if we speak many languages here in europe, cause in fact almost every country here has its own language... :P

Try to imagine:
u make a trip thru the USA and the guys in Texas speak totally different to the ones in Arizona, Oklahoma etc. :D

And until in europe there is no war which delivers a "superior language" like english to us, they will have a lot to do by translateing everything about 10 times (hey, jobs for our translateors, we need jobs over here) :lol:

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 1:27 am
by F.M.
You mean in Bogota Colombia! :roll: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:00 am
by mwtoons


Try to imagine:
u make a trip thru the USA and the guys in Texas speak totally different to the ones in Arizona, Oklahoma etc.
I live in the US and some here would argue thatTexans speak a different language than say New Englanders. I actually met a woman from Texas that had never heard of Rhode Island. I mean if you don't live in the US I can understand that, but if you lived here your whole life and don't know the 50 states?

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:57 pm
by F.M.
I think Bush speaks Euro-PigLatin!

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 2:58 pm
by mr. blaaa
F.M. wrote:You mean in Bogota Colombia! :roll: :lol: :lol:
Hm.. this is another issue.

Actually i was born and grown in Bogota till my 4th year of life.

Now i live in Germany, cause my parents sold me to some west-german-piece-of-capitalist-family...

And right now i live in Westberlin, got an own Job, an own Car and try to get some money to travel back to Colombia :wink:

(don't ever judge me) 8)

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:01 pm
by F.M.
I would try to animate that!

Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2005 3:03 pm
by mr. blaaa
mwtoons wrote: I live in the US and some here would argue thatTexans speak a different language than say New Englanders. I actually met a woman from Texas that had never heard of Rhode Island. I mean if you don't live in the US I can understand that, but if you lived here your whole life and don't know the 50 states?
Even I know Rhode Island! :lol:

knowledge is king...

Posted: Sun Sep 04, 2005 5:28 pm
by nobudget
And what about Esperanto, the language destined to become the universal language a long time ago? Klingon perhaps? I'd say English is the way to go, the best language to know around the world apart from the language of cash money. But those nations are all too self-absorbed and money keeps being wasted. I'm from The Netherlands but I can understand speaking Dutch in the EU would be silly. We've already got the half of Belgium anyway.

The Internet has adopted English as a standard a long time ago, look at this forum, many people from all around the world al writing semi-coherent English...well most people...

Even non-english speaking countries can enter English songs in the Eurovision song contest nowadays, so they stand a better chance at winning!

Reindert.
www.nobudgetvideo.com