Posted: Tue May 13, 2008 4:15 am
No I didn't turn off King Kong, but I much prefer the 1933 stop motion version. I said it turns me off when I notice it. I mean when it's really obvious and then it just spoils it for me.
Take Monster House for example. That was so MoCap I only watched it because I was interested in it technically.
Gollum in Lord of the Rings, on the other hand was not only an amazing technical achievement, it was also brilliant artistically. The actor who did the MoCap was brilliant, the character modeling was brilliant, and the facial and tweaking animation was brilliant, textures, lighting, rendering, etc. - all brilliant. I wasn't noticing the MoCap, though I knew it was used. That's because all those people were talented and did a great job.
I remember being greatly disappointed with Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings because the rotoscoping was so bad; some of it was just polarized film with a color wash over it. That's not animation.
Take Monster House for example. That was so MoCap I only watched it because I was interested in it technically.
Gollum in Lord of the Rings, on the other hand was not only an amazing technical achievement, it was also brilliant artistically. The actor who did the MoCap was brilliant, the character modeling was brilliant, and the facial and tweaking animation was brilliant, textures, lighting, rendering, etc. - all brilliant. I wasn't noticing the MoCap, though I knew it was used. That's because all those people were talented and did a great job.
I remember being greatly disappointed with Ralph Bakshi's Lord of the Rings because the rotoscoping was so bad; some of it was just polarized film with a color wash over it. That's not animation.