Page 2 of 2
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 11:50 am
by Patmals
Ahh you go there before me Myles
You gave a better explanation anyway!
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:02 pm
by myles
Patmals,
heh, we're a helpful group.
The more answers/explanations the better I reckon - the more chance somebody will understand at least one of them.
Regards, Myles
Posted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 12:05 pm
by Patmals
Thanks Myles!
Posted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:01 pm
by relik
myles wrote:As someone who is more of a hobbyist cartoonist than a tradiitonal animator and with a (limited) background in 3D I prefer to to create my characters just once then animate them, and thus I feel more comfortable using the-program-formerly-known-as-Moho.
As someone who has done it "the hard way", I don't really see the advantage of ToonBoom making an electro-digital version of a traditional light table.
I mean, Photoshop doesn't make you mix up the developer does it? The copy machine doesn't ask me for carbon paper, and there's no White Out button in Word.
I d/led the demo of ToonBoom because I was looking for something simpler than Flash (which is an application programming interface-whoever thought it was for animation?) and more "cartoon"-friendly than After Effects (which precedes Mirage and all similar compositor/animators).
ToonBoom isn't that.
Anime Studio (aka Moho) comes pretty close. -R